馬太福音導論及查經資料(參考)
以下為夜校同學的功課，所以凡引用以下的導論及查經必須遵守以下的要求：
Matthew Henry Commentary on the Whole Bible (1721): On Matthew
St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew (金口約翰，教父中的講道王子）
The
Discourses of Jesus in Matthew by Prof. Felix Just, S.J. - Loyola Marymount
University
John P. MEIER Biblica 80 (1999)
459-487 The
Present State of the 'Third Quest' for the Historical Jesus: Loss and Gain
SUMMARY
Despite the questionable method and positions of the Jesus Seminar, the third quest for the historical Jesus has resulted in seven notable gains as compared with the old quests.
Robert L. MOWERY, "Son of God in Roman Imperial Titles and Matthew" , Vol. 83(2002) 100-110.
The christological formula qeou uios, which appears in the NT only in three Matthean passages (14,33; 27,43.54), exactly parallels the two-word Roman imperial son of god formula found in the titulature of Augustus, Tiberius, Nero, Titus, and Domitian. This formula occurred more widely in first century imperial titulature than has previously been reported; in addition, various three-word imperial son of god formulas also deserve notice. The Matthean formula qeou uios would have evoked Roman imperial usage for at least some members of Matthew’s community.
Charles H. TALBERT, "Indicative
and Imperative in Matthean Soteriology" , Vol. 82(2001) 515-538.
It is usually thought that Matthew emphasizes the imperative at the expense of the indicative, demand over gift. Identifying Matthew’s indicative is difficult because in chapters 5–25, insofar as disciples are concerned, the narrative is told in terms of ‘omnipotence behind the scenes’. In Matt 5–25 four techniques appropriate to such a method of narration speak of the divine indicative in relation to the imperative. They are (1) I am with you/in your midst, (2) invoking the divine name, (3) it has been revealed to you/you have been given to know, and (4) being with Jesus. They show Matthew's soteriology is by grace from start to finish.
P.-Y. BRANDT -- A. LUKINOVICH, ?L’adresse a Jesus dans les evangiles synoptiques? , Vol. 82(2001) 17-50. (from http://www.bsw.org/?l=7182)
A number of persons in the Gospels address Jesus by a title, e.g., ‘teacher’, ‘sir’, ‘master’, when they speak to him. In parallel episodes in the synoptic Gospels these titles undergo variations. This article present a complete comparative study of the titles addressed to Jesus in Mathew, Mark and Luke and finishes with a description of the titles proper to each Gospel. (But the details are in Italian).
The Reception of the Old Testament
in Matthew and Luke-Acts: From Interpretation to Proof from
Scripture
Author(s): Mogens Muller
Source: Novum Testamentum (Brill Academic Publishers)
Year: 2001 Volume: 43 Number: 4 Pages: 315-330
C. Mezange, "Simon le Zelote etait-il un revolutionnaire?" , Vol.
81(2000) 489-506. (from http://www.bsw.org/?l=7181)
Simon’s surname, Zealot, cannot be understood to carry the meaning of ‘revolutionary against Rome’. A characteristic of the ideology of the Zealot party is the transformation of the sentiment of multi-secular religious zeal of the biblical tradition into a political, anti-Roman doctrine. This transformation in meaning is owed to the influence of, among other things, the Fourth Philosophy, which exerted its influence only in the 50’s AD. Since the elements required for the foundation of the Zealot party did not come together before these years, Simon’s surname, Zealot, can be understood only in the religious sense.
(But details are in Italian.)